Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:43:34 +0100
From:      "Christopher J. Ruwe" <cjr@cruwe.de>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc:        mexas@bris.ac.uk
Subject:   Re: poudriere and texlive, and custom make.conf
Message-ID:  <20140212174334.3610705e@dijkstra-old.hb22.cruwe.de>
In-Reply-To: <201402121532.s1CFWaqk057509@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
References:  <201402121532.s1CFWaqk057509@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:32:38 -0800 (PST)
Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk> wrote:

> What is the best way to build both tetex and texlive
> packages with poudriere?
> Do I need to create 2 different jails, one with
> TEX_DEFAULT=texlive in /etc/make.conf?
> Or is this possible to achive in the same jail,
> and with both texlive and tetex in the list of
> packages to build?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Anton
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 

I would use a "SET", see poudriere(8), section "Customization" for the
hierarchy how customs make.conf-files are pulled in. To reduce
compilation time, one could first build the with-tetex set and then
copy over (or clone) all packages to the with-texlive set. All on the
same jail and ports tree. poudriere would clean up the all
tetex-dependencies and build anew with texlive. 

A bit hackish, but works.

Cheers,
-- 
Christopher
TZ:         GMT + 1h
GnuPG/GPG:  0xE8DE2C14
 
FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #1 r256184: Thu Oct 10 19:12:54 CEST 2013
cjr@dijkstra.cruwe.de:/usr/obj/usr/home/cjr/media/src/freebsd/base/stable/9/sys/GEN_WDTRACE 
  
Punctuation matters:
"Lets eat Grandma." or "Lets eat, Grandma." - Punctuation saves lives.
"A panda eats shoots and leaves." or "A panda eats, shoots, and
leaves." - Punctuation teaches proper biology.

"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to
land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly
overhead." (RFC 1925)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140212174334.3610705e>