Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 14:39:01 +0200 From: Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de> To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Missing fixes fo 9.3-RC3 [Was: Re: Some missong patches in 9.2-RC2] Message-ID: <53BA94E5.8050008@omnilan.de> In-Reply-To: <20140707122226.GX1216@hub.FreeBSD.org> References: <520283A1.1070404@omnilan.de> <20130808145045.GA17282@glenbarber.us> <53BA682D.2070004@omnilan.de> <20140707122226.GX1216@hub.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bezüglich Glen Barber's Nachricht vom 07.07.2014 14:22 (localtime): > On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:28:13AM +0200, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: >> Bezüglich Glen Barber's Nachricht vom 08.08.2013 16:50 (localtime): >>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:28:01PM +0200, freebsd@omnilan.de wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I went through my local patches against base/releng/, 9.2 in that case. >>>> There are some fixes which are noct in 9.2-RC1: >>>> >>>> - Regarding kerberized builds: >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2011-April/043902.html >>>> >>> >>> I'll take a look at this, but I do not see this change even committed to >>> head/ yet. >> >> Hello, >> >> this krb5-config problem still seems to need attention. >> >>>> - Regarding mount failok (seems r230226 got lost?) >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=163668&cat=conf >>>> >>> >>> Closed-Date: Mon Jun 11 18:25:59 UTC 2012 >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=163668&cat=conf#reply6 >> >> >> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I understand only one part >> of the PR was MFCd: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/230373 >> MFCd to 9-stable and 8-stable on Fri Jan 20 10:06:28 2012 >> >> r230226 got lost! (Mon Jan 16 19:34:21 2012) >> > > These are both things that need to be brought to our attention before > the -RC builds begin, to be honest. Yes, I'm aware that for 9.3 my notice wouldn't be of any help. I'll try to check earlier next release! Unfortunately I don't always find time to check at all… But for mount-failok, I replied on 2013/08/08 that something seems wrong to me. Since I'm not very familar with svn I thought I understood something wrong… > I'm sorry, but these are not going to make it into the -RELEASE, but > may be fixed post-RELEASE as errata notices. Glad to see it will help :-) Thank you, -Harry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53BA94E5.8050008>