Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Apr 2016 15:26:02 +0300
From:      Dan Partelly <dan_partelly@rdsor.ro>
To:        =?utf-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= <trasz@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)
Message-ID:  <30F6CCDE-E099-49EF-9A1A-68F147FBF50B@rdsor.ro>
In-Reply-To: <20160421095706.GA57206@brick>
References:  <E1asbZj-0003Ra-Qs@rmm6prod02.runbox.com> <76093.1461096570@critter.freebsd.dk> <5716AD65.8070007@shrew.net> <BF66EA01-E073-45F0-8F9E-22D57E8871B0@bsdimp.com> <5716FA70.4080604@freebsd.org> <571765BB.3050908@quip.cz> <79117ce18bd3332c7df3e55e12a161b4@rdsor.ro> <20160421095706.GA57206@brick>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The scenario is:

Let=E2=80=99s say I have autofs_enable , working with media map.

If I have a CD in CD drive , all is well and when the system is fully =
booted up
/media contains a directory through which I can access the content of =
the=20
CD-ROM. Now if you eject this CD , and insert a new one, nothing =
happens.
/media does not contain a new access point for the new disk inserted in =
the=20
device. =20

What I would expect is when I change the media in Cd-rom , a new=20
access point for the volume in question should be reated in /media.

Perhaps this functionality is exposed differently by the automounter,
but them I would not expect the CDrom to be accessible at all though the=20=

media map.=20
=20

> he problem here is that it's quite hard to fix, there's a risk
> of breaking existing functionality, and the problem is largely =
cosmetic.

until you have more than 10 of them there, when it largely annoying.
anyway, what is the reason it is very hard to fix and it would break =
existing
functionality. can you please shed some light ? =20



> Huh, never heard about that.  I'd expect the existing mechanism to =
handle
> that case just fine.  Could you submit a PR?

> On 21 Apr 2016, at 12:57, Edward Tomasz Napiera=C5=82a =
<trasz@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>=20
> On 0420T1545, dan_partelly wrote:
>=20
> [..]
>=20
>> Another example is the autofs mounter. The prject was marked as =
complete
>> by FreeBSD foundation in 2014. Last I tried it to autmount removable
>> devices, it left directory after directory in the autofs managed =
directory.
>> This is known behavior.
>=20
> Yup.  The problem here is that it's quite hard to fix, there's a risk
> of breaking existing functionality, and the problem is largely =
cosmetic.
>=20
>> It also did not worked as it should ??? (show it
>> manage removable media correctly ) changing CD/DVD media disks. =
Presumably
>> In could have somehow manage it to work by making yet another =
scaffolding
>> of scripts as a questionable glue between devd and automounters.  =
That if
>> devd receives media change notifications. I dont know. If not I could =
patch
>> the kernel, yeah. But it is just much to simple to not bother at all =
and
>> use OSx.=20
>=20
> Huh, never heard about that.  I'd expect the existing mechanism to =
handle
> that case just fine.  Could you submit a PR?
>=20
> [..]
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to =
"freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?30F6CCDE-E099-49EF-9A1A-68F147FBF50B>