Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:44:03 -0500 From: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com> To: git@freebsd.org, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Subject: Re: Reality-checking the github repository...? Message-ID: <CAFMmRNySa=OtZEhX0wHLSfm=c4G39bnukiJMc%2BR7rjebD6%2Bhjw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20170224003931.GY1280@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20170223223541.GX1280@albert.catwhisker.org> <20170224003931.GY1280@albert.catwhisker.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, that's expected. Due to details in how git represents directory trees, it is unable to represent empty directories. On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 7:39 PM, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 02:35:41PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > > ... > > For my first try, I created a shiny new local clone of the repo we > > actually use internally,... > > > > While I rather expected the first "difference" identified: > > > > Only in ../svn/src: .svn > > > > I was quote surprised to find 64 more "Only in ../svn/src/...." lines. > > (I have attached a copy of the file.) > > > > Is this expected? > > .... > > Further investigation reveals that each of the cited file system objects > (other than .svn) either is an empty directory or only contains empty > directories. > > Does that information have an effect on whether or not the result is > "expected?" > > Thanks! > > Peace, > david > -- > David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org > How could one possibly "respect" a misogynist, racist, bullying con-man??!? > > See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFMmRNySa=OtZEhX0wHLSfm=c4G39bnukiJMc%2BR7rjebD6%2Bhjw>