Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:24:42 +1100
From:      Petr Janda <janda.petr@gmail.com>
To:        Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 10 and PostgreSQL 9.3 scalability issues
Message-ID:  <532A192A.1070509@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2610F490C952470C9D15999550F67068@multiplay.co.uk>
References:  <5327B9B7.3050103@gmail.com> <2610F490C952470C9D15999550F67068@multiplay.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

As far as I know, the test was done on both UFS2 and ZFS and the
difference was marginal.

Petr

On 18/03/2014 10:47 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Petr Janda" <janda.petr@gmail.com>
> 
> 
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Just want to share these pgbench results done by DragonFlyBSD, and would
>> like some input on why these numbers look so bad and what can be done to
>> improve (ie. kernel tunables etc) the performance.
>>
>> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20140310/4250b961/attachment-0001.pdf
>>
> 
> 
> Do you have the ability to test with FreeBSD 8.x and 9.x to see if this is
> regression?
> 
> Also you don't mention the FS used in each case, so I'm wondering if you
> used a ZFS install of FreeBSD which could help to explain things.
> 
>    Regards
>    Steve




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?532A192A.1070509>