Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 21 Mar 2016 21:39:37 -0700
From:      Russell Haley <russ.haley@gmail.com>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>, freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Effect of partitioning on wear-leveling
Message-ID:  <CABx9NuSfUfQudmUESX-MbA7-oL3R0s1LvvPeg-_gWVjfTAPtaw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <271EF73A-077C-44A5-8B58-721405800B9F@bsdimp.com>
References:  <20160321175952.GA83908@www.zefox.net> <1458586884.68920.96.camel@freebsd.org> <20160321221153.GB83908@www.zefox.net> <1458600070.68920.107.camel@freebsd.org> <1973487B-0AA7-468D-A9CC-319FBE2122F0@netgate.com> <CANCZdfrCWXAswe02Qd3tTiDL8O_4TGEWbhFqgft4Q9aKj7ixvg@mail.gmail.com> <20160322033417.GD83908@www.zefox.net> <271EF73A-077C-44A5-8B58-721405800B9F@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
How long can nand go without power before it starts to lose data integrity?

Thanks,
Russ

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mar 21, 2016, at 9:34 PM, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 08:38:13PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>>>
>>> One thing that people forget is that the underlying blocks that are written
>>> are completely independent of what lba is used to write it. So the notion
>>> that you have blocks normally part of /var or /tmp no longer makes sense.
>>> Between writing blocks in different order and garbage collection, modern SD
>>> cards do a good job of wear averaging. How much you've written to the drive
>>> in total drives wear out these days.
>>>
>>
>> How do modern flash devices report end of life? Do problems show up in error
>> logs, or does the device simply refuse to work with no warning?
>
> Undefined. Either it goes read-only or read-never. :)
>
> Warner
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABx9NuSfUfQudmUESX-MbA7-oL3R0s1LvvPeg-_gWVjfTAPtaw>