Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:01:10 +0100 From: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> To: Jakob Alvermark <jakob@alvermark.net>, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: Michael Schuster <michaelsprivate@gmail.com>, x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'End' key stopped working (xfce) Message-ID: <3c4f405b-2bb9-105d-5ba8-6949112fcb31@madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: <3336616d-284d-50b9-5a6c-fad842e508f1@alvermark.net> References: <25d26cd7-0082-675e-4655-dfe97c7b59ac@alvermark.net> <CADqw_gK1GdkkSK5nEkmXGUSvqKR4961ok-dm%2BRLu8q-1Aub1yA@mail.gmail.com> <e7ca0e41-8162-eee1-489e-154d2b13c297@alvermark.net> <9c810b1b-f117-3f8f-7d23-3917ad53f6eb@madpilot.net> <022af763-720c-219c-3590-e7632a4c0e21@alvermark.net> <5cba4fbe-8e6d-8a66-4a1c-4f3c1ec59b32@alvermark.net> <20210121075453.GA4808@FreeBSD.org> <8a49d2b6-0e2e-76ac-3f8c-8a9edcc26482@alvermark.net> <277069f9-3697-cbac-a0ab-e5e786f0f6ac@madpilot.net> <3336616d-284d-50b9-5a6c-fad842e508f1@alvermark.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 26/01/21 10:45, Jakob Alvermark wrote: > > On 1/21/21 9:25 AM, Guido Falsi wrote: >> On 21/01/21 09:10, Jakob Alvermark wrote: >>> On 1/21/21 8:54 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 08:49:39AM +0100, Jakob Alvermark wrote: >>>>> ... >>>>> Something strange is going on here. >>>>> >>>>> I changed one shortcut, next time I restarted xfce my up-arrow key >>>>> doesn't work. >>>>> >>>>> I changed one shortcut without restarting xfce and the up-arrow works >>>>> again... >>>> You might find reading the discussion in the following bugzilla PR >>>> useful (esp. comment #54): https://bugs.freebsd.org/244290. >>>> >>>> ./danfe >>> >>> Thanks for the suggestion, applying the change suggested in #54 seems >>> to have fixed the issue. >>> >> >> What change exactly? If there is a change that reliably mitigates the >> issue it could be included in the ports tree, but I'm not sure I >> understand what to change exaclty. >> >> It looks like removing the "ungrab" code line causes other >> regressions, so I'm not sure is a good candidate. > > > The change that worked was adding back the ungrab line that was removed > in that commit. > Thanks for the feedback. If that change really works for most users it's a good candidate for inclusion in the ports tree. I'd also try to get it back upstream. I followed up to bug 244290 about this. But since I'm not experiencing the issue myself I can't test this. So I'm asking for consensus from users. -- Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3c4f405b-2bb9-105d-5ba8-6949112fcb31>