Date: Fri, 6 Jun 1997 11:05:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Stefan Molnar <stefan@exis.net> To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> Cc: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" <michaelv@MindBender.serv.net>, Jim Dixon <jdd@vbc.net>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re:UNIX vs NT Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970606110235.28732A-100000@sailfish.exis.net> In-Reply-To: <3398711D.699C@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> And now back to the theme...
> Yeah, OS2 is a very cool product and has always been ages ahead of M$,
> but their marketing and technical support sucks :(.
The marketing and tech does kinda have something less than to be desired.
I think of it this way, the majority of ATM machines use OS/2. I like
it. But that is coming from a guy that has a OS/2 Warp Server with SMP
doing an NFS mount to a FBSDbox.
Stefan
"...Alll things are good, esp. an axe to a troubled server."
-Said while on a caffeine high
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.95.970606110235.28732A-100000>