Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 11:10:29 -0700 From: Jake Burkholder <jake@checker.org> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rfork patch, please comment Message-ID: <19991028181029.A85ED1FD7@io.yi.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 28 Oct 1999 19:54:07 %2B0200." <38188DBF.FCD05915@scc.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> [No time yet to dig into this in more detail] > > Jake Burkholder wrote: > > > I've made a patch that adds linux 'clone' style support > > to rfork, and I'd like to hear opinions on whether this > > is an ok way to do it. > > Does this improve the support for clone in the Linuxulator? No, there is already some support there. That's where I got the idea, see /usr/src/sys/i386/linux/linux_misc.c:linux_clone. What it does, as I see it, is open the door for native kernel threads, which of course still requires a thread-safe libc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991028181029.A85ED1FD7>