Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Jun 2000 21:11:49 +0200
From:      Marc Silver <marcs@draenor.org>
To:        Roelof Osinga <roelof@nisser.com>
Cc:        Steve Coles <scoles@tripos.com>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Relative merits of IPFIREWALL and IPFILTER
Message-ID:  <20000609211149.C81376@draenor.org>
In-Reply-To: <39413FFB.85A522F6@nisser.com>; from roelof@nisser.com on Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 09:05:31PM %2B0200
References:  <0f4a01bfd229$00605ab0$4c9814ac@volga.TRIPOS.COM> <39413FFB.85A522F6@nisser.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
errr, nope.  :)  ipfw can handle stateful stuff  :)

Cheers,
Marc

On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 09:05:31PM +0200, Roelof Osinga wrote:
> Steve Coles wrote:
> > 
> > At first glance, ipfilter and ipfirewall seem to offer similar things, yet
> > they are distinct (?) What are the relative pros and cons of these kernel
> > features.
> 
> The short answer is that ipf handles state which ipfw does not.
> 
> Roelof
> 
> -- 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000609211149.C81376>