Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 15:58:46 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: New virtual categories? Message-ID: <20000614155846.A15672@mithrandr.moria.org> In-Reply-To: <39478BB8.527DC4E9@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 04:42:16PM %2B0300 References: <20000614150356.A14885@mithrandr.moria.org> <20000614151150.A1730@cichlids.cichlids.com> <394787B5.9F88670B@FreeBSD.org> <20000614152938.A15251@mithrandr.moria.org> <39478BB8.527DC4E9@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed 2000-06-14 (16:42), Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > I prefer "themes" (which is what I meant, not "theme"). It can cover > > irc themes, enlightenment themes, gtk themes, and so forth. No need for > > the 'x11-'. It's a virtual category anyway. > > Just to reflect the fact that they are all x11-related. It is why we have > x11-clocks, x11-fm etc. It is a restrictive term. Also, the themes may not be related to x11, but to programs that run under x11. There is a difference. There may be themes that aren't run under x11 either. I don't want to be _forced_ not to include them because the category name is 'x11-themes'. (Why aren't windowmaker apps in the 'x11-windowmaker' category instead of the 'windowmaker' category? *grin*) Anyway, 'themes' looks nicer. (And I suggested, it, so wah! *grin*) Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner Sunesi Clinical Systems nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000614155846.A15672>