Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 22:16:31 -0800 From: Weongyo Jeong <weongyo.jeong@gmail.com> To: Rohit Grover <rgrover1@gmail.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for Test and Review: bwn(4) - another Broadcom Wireless driver Message-ID: <20100110061631.GT1491@weongyo> In-Reply-To: <426bed111001092141w3bdff099y635532961436fcf9@mail.gmail.com> References: <20091223035331.GA1293@weongyo> <426bed111001021900i4ed55836u456a12f6c578df72@mail.gmail.com> <20100107025727.GJ1491@weongyo> <426bed111001061938j70d2846bk19375f6369c2c102@mail.gmail.com> <20100107040600.GN1491@weongyo> <426bed111001092141w3bdff099y635532961436fcf9@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 06:41:21PM +1300, Rohit Grover wrote: > Hi, > > > Please try attached patch in bwn_probe() and show me dmesg output. ?If > > bwn(4) doesn't print anything that means ssb(4) works incorrectly. ?But > > there are some outputs and bwn(4) doesn't be attached then your device > > revision isn't supported. > > > > > After applying your patch, I get the following upon loading if_bwn: > > bwn0: vendor 0x4243 cid 0x812 rev 12 > > Therefore, I should infer that the device revision isn't supported? Yes it looks your revision isn't supported. > Do you know when this device might be supported? I think it could be supported when bwn(4) supports N PHYs I hope. regards, Weongyo Jeong
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100110061631.GT1491>