Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:03:41 +0000 From: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> To: "LI Xin" <delphij@delphij.net> Cc: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, Anton Yuzhaninov <citrin@citrin.ru> Subject: Re: Automatic TCP send and receive socket buffer sizing Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0612211603i28111be4ve51ae47ef6c26bcd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <458A9633.1060908@delphij.net> References: <457F2D82.6000905@freebsd.org> <1299780826.20061214141629@citrin.ru> <458142DB.8000002@freebsd.org> <20061220084515.GK48407@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <3aaaa3a0612210148n78b326a5wde5efa2e8dc4edb9@mail.gmail.com> <458A8BD6.5020004@delphij.net> <458A9633.1060908@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21/12/06, LI Xin <delphij@delphij.net> wrote: > LI Xin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Chris wrote: > >> I think the opposite, without this patch my send window set to 256k > >> for 'all' connections to allow decent speeds. > >> > >> With the patch most connections will be just 8k in size and some be 256k. > >> > >> so worst case scenario with patch during a DOS they will all use 256k > >> windows but without the patch they would all use 256k regardless. > >> > >> p.s. waiting still for releng 6 patch :) > > > > Unofficial backport for andre@'s patch. I am testing it on RELENG_6_2 > > but the box is not heavily loaded, and please note that this is > > UNOFFICIAL so it's up to you to decide whether you want it. > > Oops, forgot the patch. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/misc/patch-tcp_auto_buf-20061212-RELENG_6.diff > > Cheers, > -- > Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> http://www.delphij.net/ > FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! > > > > Thanks will this apply ok against src with the send patch already applied or should I recvsup and then apply this clean? Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3aaaa3a0612211603i28111be4ve51ae47ef6c26bcd>