Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:55:57 -0800 From: Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org> To: Vince <jhary@unsane.co.uk> Cc: Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: is this for OO-2 for FBSD? Message-ID: <20071030215557.GB5965@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <4727035C.5040408@unsane.co.uk> References: <20071029201941.GA99664@thought.org> <4727035C.5040408@unsane.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 10:11:40AM +0000, Vince wrote: > Gary Kline wrote: > > I'm in the middle of upgrading some platforms and just caught > > OOo_OOG680_m6_source.tar.bz2 (278MB) being downloaded. The port > > says that this is OO-2.3, but the build says Ishould have > > 11GB of disk and ~2GB of memory. > > > > I somehow downloaded OO_2.3 as a package on one platform. Does > > this make any sense? How many of us have 2 gigs of memory? > > Seems more than a biit irrational to me. Or did my > > portupgrade -aP grab the wrong port? > > > I think the problem is that the build does take so long and so much > resources that the package updates are a bit scarce. The latest I can > see on the mirrors is openoffice.org-2.3.20070910.tbz which doesnt seem > to fit the numbering scheme for the openoffice.org-2 port but does fit > openoffice.org-2-RC which seems a bit odd. I would probably just get the > latest package from the openoffice package site > (ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/FreeBSD/2.3.0/i386/FreeBSD6) > and upgrade manually. As a 7.0 user I had to build my own which took a > while. > Thanks foe thr ftp. I'll see if I can grab it? gary > > Vince > > > gary > > > -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071030215557.GB5965>