Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 00:49:49 +0800 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru> To: Boris Kochergin <spawk@acm.poly.edu> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Andrew Thompson <thompsa@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: if_gif/if_bridge problem Message-ID: <20080904164949.GA76939@svzserv.kemerovo.su> In-Reply-To: <48C00372.8030600@acm.poly.edu> References: <47C428EC.3090909@acm.poly.edu> <20080226162307.GA80931@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <47C4439A.9050502@acm.poly.edu> <20080226175616.GC1509@heff.fud.org.nz> <47C4FB54.FF2F89EF@kuzbass.ru> <48C00372.8030600@acm.poly.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 11:49:06AM -0400, Boris Kochergin wrote: > Ahoy. I've been using the patch for a while, and, recently, when the > load on the wireless network I needed it for has increased, I've started > getting kernel panics that I think the patch is responsible for. The > panics are usually foreshadowed by messages in the style of "Sep 3 > 11:34:14 unique kernel: delayed m_pullup, m->len: 22 off: 38333 p: 97" > in the kernel buffer. I like to think that I've eliminated the > possibility of bad hardware by changing the motherboard, memory, and > Ethernet controllers in the machine, and have tried both Eugene's > original patchset and the one that was committed to 7-STABLE, with the > same ill effects. Any ideas about what might be wrong, or shall I set > about getting a backtrace? Thanks. Yes, you should. And I think you no more need my patches after Andrew's fixes to gif(4). But if you need my changes to lagg(4), you should now use version corrected to apply to recent RELENG_7: ftp://www.kuzbass.ru/pub/freebsd/lagg-0.2.tgz There were no functional changes, only context changes after Anrew's commit. Eugene Grosbein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080904164949.GA76939>