Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 12:41:19 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: Aristedes Maniatis <ari@ish.com.au> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dumb SVN question: update between branches Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0909021240340.10335@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <4A9E28BF.7080007@ish.com.au> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0909021134080.10335@woozle.rinet.ru> <4A9E28BF.7080007@ish.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: AM> On 2/09/09 5:41 PM, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: AM> > what in this case I should do to have stable/8 (retaining my local AM> > changes, AM> > otherwise I'd just blow the whole tree up and re-checkout it). Sure I can AM> > store AM> > `svn diff' output, checkout fresh tree and try to apply diff there, but AM> > this AM> > way does not seem natural to me. AM> AM> "svn switch" will do what you want. I find it helpful to create a patch as AM> backup first just in case something goes wrong. Ah thanks a lot. I somehow overlooked this simple and straightforward way ;-) -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0909021240340.10335>