Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:07:15 +0200 From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> To: d@delphij.net Cc: Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent nc(1) changes Message-ID: <4BC771F3.7020608@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <4BC76DA6.4050303@delphij.net> References: <4BC767FE.4060504@delphij.net> <4BC76C02.6050304@bsdforen.de> <4BC76DA6.4050303@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15/04/2010 21:48, Xin LI wrote: > On 2010/04/15 12:41, Dominic Fandrey wrote: >> On 15/04/2010 21:24, Xin LI wrote: >>> ... > >> I'd say that the data loss (~1%) when I tried to use nc with UNIX sockets >> (on both ends) is much more troublesome than your changes. >> Even when I used lockf to synchronize socket access this loss occured >> and I have fallen back to using files for messaging in my scripts. > > Data loss? Sounds like a bug to me. Do you have any reproduction scripts? No, but I'll put something together over the weekend if you want to look at something. Regards -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BC771F3.7020608>