Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Jun 2010 08:36:47 -0400
From:      jhell <jhell@dataix.net>
To:        Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>
Cc:        marco.broeder@gmx.eu, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: License Framework: Develop Best Practices
Message-ID:  <4C1A16DF.5080808@dataix.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C192EC3.7000304@bsdforen.de>
References:  <201006150247.20325.marco.broeder@gmx.eu> <4C192EC3.7000304@bsdforen.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/16/2010 16:06, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 15/06/2010 02:46, Marco Bröder wrote:
>> BSD-2-clause    # Simplified BSD License
>> BSD-3-clause    # Modified or New BSD License
>> BSD-4-clause    # Original BSD License
> 
> Just a side note, am I the only one using a single clause variant
> of the BSDL? I really don't give a damn what people do with
> binaries, so out went the clause.
> 

So really your using a MIT Style license just with a clause instead of
the staticlly written "The above copyright notice and this permission
notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
Software."

So why not just use that instead.


Regards,

-- 

 jhell



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C1A16DF.5080808>