Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:23:06 -0400 From: jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> To: FreeBSD Filesystems <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Cc: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Subject: Re: Strange behaviour with sappend flag set on ZFS Message-ID: <4CA10B3A.10401@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <4CA0C62E.4080809@icyb.net.ua> References: <201009231938.09548.cal@linu.gs> <66757A1E-E445-4AAD-8F57-382D85BFD579@hostpoint.ch> <201009271624.46655.cal@linu.gs> <20100927181233.0e8c2869@ernst.jennejohn.org> <4CA0C62E.4080809@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/27/2010 12:28, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 27/09/2010 19:12 Gary Jennejohn said the following: >> >> Sending a PR is always a good idea - it ends up in the tracking >> system and doesn't get lost in the mailing-list noise. > > Yeah, it just gets lost in the PR database instead :) > While the thread is active there is some hope that someone would get hooked. > Yeah! ;) On the same note, hopes and wishes high, would be real nice if all userland flags would work. Specifically arch, opaque, uappend, uchg, uunlink. But like I said this is just a wish and more a convenience than anything else. If I would put something at the top of the list it would be opaque and then uchg. Regards, Hi Andriy, -- jhell,v
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CA10B3A.10401>