Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:38:21 +0200
From:      Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, d.forsyth@ru.ac.za
Subject:   Re: how to fix bad superblock
Message-ID:  <201107190938.36091.tijl@coosemans.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E2447F5.24958.3553D439@d.forsyth.ru.ac.za>
References:  <4E2447F5.24958.3553D439@d.forsyth.ru.ac.za>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart5465022.iDhTxr3TWE
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Monday 18 July 2011 16:49:25 DA Forsyth wrote:
> After a hardrive let the smoke out last week, part of a 4 drive RAID=20
> array, I am now battling to get back into the array.
> I have replaced the bad drive and it has been rebuilt (Intel Matrix=20
> Raid on the motherboard).
>=20
> some partitions are ok but had lots of errors fsck fixed, others=20
> report=20
> ** /dev/ar0s1f
> BAD SUPER BLOCK: VALUES IN SUPER BLOCK DISAGREE WITH THOSE IN FIRST=20
> ALTERNATE
>=20
> it then asks if it must look for alternates but claims 32 is not one=20
> and stops.  All my partitions are UFS so why doesn't it look at block=20
> 160?

You may want to ask your question on the freebsd-fs mailing list.

--nextPart5465022.iDhTxr3TWE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD)

iF4EABEIAAYFAk4lNHsACgkQfoCS2CCgtiu/VAD/QaOchQdMBp7MNh1tcYw+ORko
PFZVryKtdmA03t+4oDMA/R2cg11eeZ2ZJX4iP3OZQExiyldgzGYTLBr9PsJGMhJ2
=FNCe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart5465022.iDhTxr3TWE--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201107190938.36091.tijl>