Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:37:25 -0700 From: "Crist J. Clark" <cristjc@earthlink.net> To: "John Holstein, IS" <jholstein@cnpapers.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gateway and multiple subnets round II Message-ID: <20011011123725.A293@blossom.cjclark.org> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20011011082956.041aab70@mail.cnpapers.com>; from jholstein@cnpapers.com on Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 08:45:02AM -0400 References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011010141951.0419e750@mail.cnpapers.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20011009143853.041e3ec8@pop.cotse.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20011009143853.041e3ec8@pop.cotse.com> <20011009232857.D387@blossom.cjclark.org> <5.1.0.14.2.20011010141951.0419e750@mail.cnpapers.com> <20011010203259.S387@blossom.cjclark.org> <5.1.0.14.2.20011011082956.041aab70@mail.cnpapers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 08:45:02AM -0400, John Holstein, IS wrote:
> At 08:32 PM 10/10/2001 -0700, you wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 02:47:16PM -0400, John Holstein, IS wrote:
> > > At 11:28 PM 10/9/2001 -0700, you wrote:
> >
> >[snip]
> >
> > > >So, are you saying the real picture is,
> > > >
> > > > 192.168.0.x -----}
> > > > 192.168.1.x -----}
> > > > }--Cisco Router--|ed0 FreeBSD GW ed1|---- internet
> > > > 192.9.200.x -----}
> > > > 192.9.205.x -----}
[snip]
> Well, you see, that's the overall problem. The network isn't setup
> correctly, in my opinion. Another problem is, it works, however incorrectly.
>
> Here's the current (working) setup:
>
> 192.168.0.x (DHCP allocated IP's for Workstations [ethernet])
> 192.9.200.x (Static Internal IP's for Workstations [ethernet])
>
> 192.168.1.x (DHCP allocated IP's for Workstations [token ring])
> 192.9.205.x (Static Internal IP's for Workstations [token ring])
>
> ** Please note, this is how it's been relayed to me. I run the webservers,
> we two other people doing the internal networking.
>
> All four subnets above go through --> Cisco Router (ip 192.9.200.4) --> (ip
> 192.9.200.254) Pix Firewall (external IP) -----------> internet
>
> The Cisco Router is looking to 192.9.200.254 as the gateway, passing
> everything through. I had the FreeBSD box on the 200.254 IP, and it would
> pass everything through that was on that subnet. Anything else, the other
> three subnets, would not get passed the FreeBSD box. So, assuming the
> router is passing everything "as is" from the other subnets, looking to
> 200.254 as the gate, my thoughts are, it needs to be further configured to
> get the other subnets out.
Your Cisco "router" isn't routing. It looks like its bridging. For
routing purposes, it can be ignored. What is the default gateway for
machines on each of the various networks, 192.168.0.x, 192.9.200.x,
192.168.1.x, and 192.9.205.x? Your FreeBSD box needs to have each of
the default gateway addresses put on ed0.
--
Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu
cjclark@jhu.edu
cjc@freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011011123725.A293>