Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 23:09:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Marco Muskus <marcomuskus@une.net.co> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Anonymous Remailer \(austria\)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> Subject: Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208072309370.1652@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <5021641E.4030206@une.net.co> References: <793d6519ca3648de7634faff1829b9f7@remailer.privacy.at> <5021641E.4030206@une.net.co>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > English is not my native language, so i can make mistakes. ZFS is the way to > go if you need consistency + speed on a NFS server/service. Of course "ZFS doesn't need fsck". Until it fails.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1208072309370.1652>