Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 06 Nov 2012 06:31:48 -0600
From:      Chuck Burns <break19@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: polling's future [was: Re: Dynamic Ticks/HZ]
Message-ID:  <32992731.3rb8pPz1Mv@blackbeast.local>
In-Reply-To: <5098F64E.1070704@freebsd.org>
References:  <509758B8.1000409@rewt.org.uk> <20121106113014.GA26313@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <5098F64E.1070704@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, November 06, 2012 12:36:46 PM Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 06.11.2012 12:30, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:23:34AM +0100, Andre Oppermann 
wrote:
> > ...
> > 
> >> Hi Luigi,
> >> 
> >> do you agree on polling having outlived its usefulness in the light
> >> of interrupt moderating NIC's and SMP 
complications/disadvantages?
> > 
> > yes, we should let it rest in peace.
> 
> Thank you for this non-complicated answer. :-)
> 

I worry about what happens for those people who would be running 
FreeBSD on older equipment where polling might still make sense.

Do we throw them under the bus?

-- 
Chuck Burns



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?32992731.3rb8pPz1Mv>