Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 17:25:25 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: Joshua Isom <jrisom@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Fine, OK, here's my initial AR9380/AR9485 support Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=sC1Akv2r-UsvtLkEX7QSokw3FVU7nhUN29KHGdnEhCg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5143A1C3.7010304@gmail.com> References: <5142813d.83c2e00a.67a8.39d5@mx.google.com> <514284E5.9060303@gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmok255ODmYaq5FShODzeLt9QvAeNS7Ef-7sVF5_BSoq2Vg@mail.gmail.com> <51428E10.1000801@gmail.com> <CAJ-VmokkXaNHki-yza5hBzUN9z7FhzPH3RbwLsUchm8t5toM0g@mail.gmail.com> <78975985-a190-4915-82b5-b1810d6115b2@email.android.com> <CAJ-VmongS-xwLAhxG4gK4kMTMfFHzLADdTeOMqX5M4vPg79GNw@mail.gmail.com> <5143A1C3.7010304@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15 March 2013 15:33, Joshua Isom <jrisom@gmail.com> wrote: >> ar9300_set_stub_functions: setting stub functions >> ar9300_set_stub_functions: setting stub functions >> ar9300_attach: calling ar9300_hw_attach >> ar9300_hw_attach: calling ar9300_eeprom_attach >> ar9300_flash_map: unimplemented for now >> Restoring Cal data from DRAM >> Restoring Cal data from EEPROM >> ar9300_hw_attach: ar9300_eeprom_attach returned 0 >> ath0: RX status length: 48 >> ath0: RX buffer size: 4096 >> ath0: TX descriptor length: 128 >> ath0: TX status length: 36 >> ath0: TX buffers per descriptor: 4 >> ar9300_freebsd_setup_x_tx_desc: called, 0x0/0, 0x0/0, 0x0/0 .. I really should remove that, but. >> ath0: ath_edma_setup_rxfifo: type=0, FIFO depth = 16 entries >> ath0: ath_edma_setup_rxfifo: type=1, FIFO depth = 128 entries >> ath0: [HT] enabling HT modes >> ath0: [HT] enabling short-GI in 20MHz mode >> ath0: [HT] 1 stream STBC receive enabled >> ath0: [HT] 1 stream STBC transmit enabled >> ath0: [HT] 3 RX streams; 3 TX streams >> ath0: AR9380 mac 448.3 RF5110 phy 0.0 Cool, normal AR9380. Nothing fancy. >> ath0: 2GHz radio: 0x0000; 5GHz radio: 0x0000 >> ar9300_Stub_GetSlotTime: called >> ar9300_Stub_GetSlotTime: called >> ar9300_Stub_GetCTSTimeout: called >> ar9300_Stub_GetCTSTimeout: called >> ar9300_Stub_GetAntennaSwitch: called >> ar9300_Stub_GetAntennaSwitch: called Ok. I should implement those stub routines in the driver. Can you file a bug report (against my fork, not the qca tree) with the above stubs? That way I don't forget. I wonder why you see them and I don't. Or do I just never check dmesg. >> wlan0: Ethernet address: 64:70:02:18:6d:95 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 This is well known. For some odd reason I get a RXEOL interrupt when I initialise the RX FIFO. I don't know why yet. It's harmless but I'd like to figure out why. >> ar9300_reset[4254]: ar9300_stop_dma_receive failed Likely another channel scan, maybe? Or maybe it finally associated? >> ath0: ath_edma_recv_proc_queue: handled npkts 0 ngood 0 Thanks for being patient so far! Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=sC1Akv2r-UsvtLkEX7QSokw3FVU7nhUN29KHGdnEhCg>