Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:43:32 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-update? Message-ID: <20130425064332.4f15a20a6a46dade5aa9a0e4@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <5178A647.4030302@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <201304242307.r3ON7AEg039368@chilled.skew.org> <201304242232170093.02EE4C98@sentry.24cl.com> <20130425044744.3ebda15f.freebsd@edvax.de> <201304242332000938.0324FC0A@sentry.24cl.com> <5178A647.4030302@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:43:03 +1000 Da Rock <freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote: > Interesting. My only observation was that sysctl is supposed to be the > 'system' database where all queries relate to. It is supposed to display > everything about the system; therefore any of these data bits should be > fixed here first. Anything else would be a 'feature' :) That would be nice - one way to achieve that would be to add a writable oid for patch level and not bump newvers.sh for patches. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130425064332.4f15a20a6a46dade5aa9a0e4>