Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:17:05 +0100
From:      Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl>
To:        Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <virtualization@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Bhyve and Ubuntu booting
Message-ID:  <530A2D11.707@digiware.nl>
In-Reply-To: <530A2B35.6090409@freebsd.org>
References:  <53090599.5000505@digiware.nl>	<CAG=rPVdtQX32pvxNPo9SqRb3q7zQSTopD2qXnSDer0NvEq2kiw@mail.gmail.com>	<20AAA4CA-38F9-4D07-BAAA-434F8BC20129@digiware.nl> <CAG=rPVd50JwE9No0SSsgT83nM=DNzLdhCN6ws2QHiawOqi7DDQ@mail.gmail.com> <530A20BE.4050602@digiware.nl> <530A2475.6090608@freebsd.org> <530A2713.6000602@digiware.nl> <530A2870.9080306@freebsd.org> <530A2978.7070403@digiware.nl> <530A2B35.6090409@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23-2-2014 18:09, Peter Grehan wrote:
>> -w does not exist on my bhyve
>> bhyve: illegal option -- w
> 
>  Hmmm, just checked and you're right. Looks like a mis-merge - this
> change went into CURRENT in early December, and the most recent sync for
> the SVM branch was from Jan 14 :(
> 
>  Now I'm wondering what else hasn't made it in :(

Pervious time I tried diff between current and the SVM branch, but that
was just a bit too much for me to sort out.

If I feel up to it tonight, I'll go and digg some more, but big change
it still is too much diff te really grasp.

Against what current version did you merge/build the SVM branch?
I'll either check that out, or try my subversion skills to see if that
reduces the diff.

--WjW





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?530A2D11.707>