Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 10:59:56 -0700 From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A couple of trivial BIND (dynamic update) questions Message-ID: <28907.1413136796@server1.tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <543A4244.1000401@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <543A4244.1000401@FreeBSD.org>, Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >On 12/10/2014 02:05, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >... >> /var/named/var/run/named/session.key >> >> So, um, how come? The default location wasn't good enough? > >You're running chrooted to /var/named. All paths will have /var/named >tacked onto the front. Ah! OK. It makes sense now. >> So, um, what is the Right Solution here? Do I need to re-jigger >> the permissions on /var/named/etc/namedb/master to 0775 and then >> add user-ID "bind" to the wheel group in /etc/groups? > >/var/named/etc/namedb/master is for zones where the data is managed by >means other than dynamic update. > >If you're using dynamic update, then create a new directory >/ver/named/etc/namedb/dynamic and make it mode 755 but owned by the bind >UID and GID (similar to the slave directory). Use that for storing the >data for all your dynamic update zones. OK, thanks much. I will certainly do that. (In fact, that is so obviously the correct solution that I am a bit embarassed that I didn't just think of it myself.)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28907.1413136796>