Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 10:23:40 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, "alex.burlyga.ietf alex.burlyga.ietf" <alex.burlyga.ietf@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Recovering an unlink-ed, but still opened file Message-ID: <5659C6FC.9080708@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <56597B78.6060203@freebsd.org> References: <5658E498.9070700@aldan.algebra.com> <CA%2BJhTNQh2CKwuEsKcc0v=G=0zG4a5JQTYO56bXv%2B3MmZ8=MVDg@mail.gmail.com> <56591999.1040001@aldan.algebra.com> <CA%2BJhTNTDE_orbEj5EV1VXjSB%2BtNWNmNQdSR9Q07aKZH5eWD8oA@mail.gmail.com> <56593251.90705@aldan.algebra.com> <56597B78.6060203@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28.11.2015 05:01, Julian Elischer wrote:
> are you allowed to reboot?
I'd rather it was not required...
> fsdb may be your answer to relink it and then reboot, causing fsck to
> correct the linkage counts.
Can't the linkage count be fixed by other means? Some equivalent of link(2):
linkfd(pid_t pid, int fd, const char *name2);
? Yours,
-mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5659C6FC.9080708>