Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:55:08 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: "Koster, K.J." <K.J.Koster@kpn.com> Cc: "'Kris Kirby'" <kris@catonic.net>, "'FreeBSD Alpha mailing list'" <freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Alpha 4.x releases (production quality?) Message-ID: <20001018145508.A71459@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D794A@l04.research.kpn.com>; from K.J.Koster@kpn.com on Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 03:14:25PM %2B0100 References: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D794A@l04.research.kpn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 03:14:25PM +0100, Koster, K.J. wrote: > It works both ways. There are fewer people who are working to fix buffer > overflows on alpha, 99% of the buffer overflows are in the MI (machine independent) code and thus shared with the i386. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001018145508.A71459>