Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 20:50:29 +0200 From: Paul Schenkeveld <fb-chat@psconsult.nl> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inspired by "Two years ago today..." Message-ID: <20081006185028.GA68859@psconsult.nl> In-Reply-To: <84DD05D6-1D6C-49D6-B778-CC9CC2E14494@langille.org> References: <de2590e90810060752h41ed6462wc250732e1b9c767@mail.gmail.com> <20081006154552.GA64089@psconsult.nl> <20081006163526.GA11984@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> <84DD05D6-1D6C-49D6-B778-CC9CC2E14494@langille.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 01:32:55PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > > On Oct 6, 2008, at 12:35 PM, David Kelly wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 05:45:52PM +0200, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:52:17AM -0300, Alex Moura wrote: >>>> I don't recommend to try this at home, but thinking about sharing a >>>> curiousity... >>>> >>>> localhost:~$ uname -a && uptime >>>> FreeBSD localhost 4.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE #0: Wed Dec 13 >>>> 16:19:46 BRST 2000 11:20AM up 2642 days, 2:16, 1 user, load >>>> averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 >>> >>> This must be fake, 2642 days ago it was Fri Jul 13, 2001 :-) >> >> Why must it be fake? jkh announced 4.1-RELEASE on Thu Jul 27 05:17:13 >> PDT 2000, the above kernel was built in December 2000, and uptime >> indicates it was last booted in July 2001. All quite reasonable. > > +1 > > I'd like to hear the explanation behind the claims of 'fake'. If it were up one day longer I wouldn't be triggered but powered up on friday 13th and running for seven+ years... :-) > -- > Dan Langille > http://langille.org/ -- Paul Schenkeveld
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081006185028.GA68859>