Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 05:33:42 -0700 (MST) From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: should MINIMAL boot? Message-ID: <1505478822371-0.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <86r2vbg1vk.fsf@newsrv.interne.associated-bears.org> References: <20170912183708.GA16405@mail.michaelwlucas.com> <86r2vbg1vk.fsf@newsrv.interne.associated-bears.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The definition of a MINIMAL used is a specific one- it does not contain anything which can be loaded by modules. It could be a starting point to something else, but then, it still contains other things you probably not need. If I get the point, I would probably try to boot MINIMAL on a new hardware, build all modules by default, see which modules get loaded and work from there. -- Sent from: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/freebsd-current-f3875308.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1505478822371-0.post>