Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:11:16 +0000 From: "J. Mallett" <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Masafumi NAKANE <max@wide.ad.jp> Cc: "J. Mallett" <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/pdflib Makefile Message-ID: <20020510101116.GA17043@FreeBSD.ORG> In-Reply-To: <871yckpc32.wl@turkey.aslm.rim.or.jp> References: <200205100648.g4A6m5979188@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020510065209.GA1084@FreeBSD.ORG> <873cx0pilc.wl@turkey.aslm.rim.or.jp> <20020510080026.GA5691@FreeBSD.ORG> <871yckpc32.wl@turkey.aslm.rim.or.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 06:49:05PM +0900, Masafumi NAKANE wrote: > On Fri, 10 May 2002 08:00:26 +0000, > J. Mallett wrote: > > Those dates, and the fact they're staggered like that, but given > > your response leads me to believe that you aren't checking out the > > RELENG_4 branch for those dates, but rather using machines where > > the world was built on those days. > > > > Is that so? > > Yes, but make world was done right after cvsup'ing using > stable-supfile. So, timestamp on the files is fairly close to when > source files were checked out. Then I'd place my money on peripheral changes to the userland that affect the build targets (either their creation or their production of $< for a given $@). What I was checking was whether you were actually testing make(1) or just variants of STABLE. Use gmake if it seems to make it all work fine. Thanks. -- jmallett@FreeBSD.org | C, MIPS, POSIX, UNIX, BSD, IRC Geek. http://www.FreeBSD.org | The Power to Serve "I've never tried to give my life meaning by demeaning you." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020510101116.GA17043>