Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 08 Dec 2003 10:51:27 +0300
From:      Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
To:        Masafumi NAKANE <max@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        portmgr@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: proposal to enable to skip installation of perl mod man pages
Message-ID:  <3FD42D7F.6080408@ciam.ru>
In-Reply-To: <874qwcf2ur.wl%max@wide.ad.jp>
References:  <8765gvfuo2.wl%max@wide.ad.jp>	<3FD08D6E.3070703@ciam.ru> <874qwcf2ur.wl%max@wide.ad.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Masafumi NAKANE wrote:

> On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 16:51:42 +0300,
> Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> wrote:
> 
>>Why don't you use NO_INSTALL_MANPAGES variable instead of NO_PERL_MAN3?
> 
> 
> Because, as I understand it, NO_INSTALL_MANPAGES is to say the port
> does not install the man pages, as in port that uses Imake, but no
> install.man target exists.  So, NO_INSTALL_MANPAGES is for porters to
> define the behavior of the port, while the proposed NO_PERL_MAN3 is
> for users to adjust it.

I agree it's works only for imake but there are quite many variables by 
this time so I think we need use some unify variables, do not make a new 
one. (IMHO)
-- 
Sem.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FD42D7F.6080408>