Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 22:00:43 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@freebsd.org> Cc: kib@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFT/CFR] machine independent sf_bufs Message-ID: <20140729180043.GG89995@glebius.int.ru> In-Reply-To: <A40E0DEE-153A-4698-AFC9-657DD4C56E05@freebsd.org> References: <20140719062725.GB85917@FreeBSD.org> <20140729104156.GD89995@FreeBSD.org> <A40E0DEE-153A-4698-AFC9-657DD4C56E05@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 07:29:43PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: M> > Sorry for top quoting, this is to annoy you :) I got zero M> > replies on the below email during a week. I'd really appreciate M> > testing on different platforms. Any takers? M> OK, it works on an Raspberry pi running r269231 with your patch. M> The only suspicious thing I observed was that the number of M> 'requests for I/O initiated by sendfile' in netstat -m doesn't M> always increase. I would expect that. However, I'm not sure if M> this is ARM related (I would not think so) or is related to your M> patch at all. Thanks a lot, Michael! The observation on number of I/Os is absolutely okay, since VM cashes pages. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140729180043.GG89995>