Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:22:46 +0200 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, paul <paul_@freemail.hu> Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs YouTube Message-ID: <20100714192246.b4daa560.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilLgKYIIgpvR-CfyfMRP1x-faUzt7e_E4dwA-hP@mail.gmail.com> References: <freemail.20100714182602.26042.1@xmldata14.freemail.hu> <20100714190142.da43214e.freebsd@edvax.de> <AANLkTilLgKYIIgpvR-CfyfMRP1x-faUzt7e_E4dwA-hP@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:06:14 +0300, Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@gmail.com> wrote: > Is this the same way the Linux users have it?:-) I don't think so. The Linux "Flash" plugin seems to work better on Linux than it does on FreeBSD. Linux, as well as OpenSolaris, is a platform with better support, so I think the regular way on using "Flash" stuff on Linux is to have this plugin installed for Firefox. As I'm not a regular Linux user, I can't be sure, but at least that's my opinion. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100714192246.b4daa560.freebsd>