Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:03:24 -0700
From:      Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>
To:        Alexander Sack <pisymbol@gmail.com>
Cc:        Juli Mallett <jmallett@freebsd.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Dual-rate transceivers with ixgbe?
Message-ID:  <AANLkTim9-Za5mzLTw7MDAHY_TuIQsQ0SF0_1xpxyGY7v@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim5Ao9nSh6T6HF7NztLgvbTzxuVyr8lSXAJ7bMo@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTinO9NZ8F9TeS68I2ULQgdlMGzlXkinCsywWosAM@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinS607kd3wc3F2WWmA6Zk9KL4GhscxEHPtcvxA5@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimkxOn9h6SAkTPDqfUM9kl2CZiFrZC_BuNDfRyB@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikcQMXk8UebmaynOeeInGiwx8yr0NMGE1yJfm8u@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTil_YRvU54qHtIMO7mP4yYjojeHVrCHaRcl2K2Ug@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTim5Ao9nSh6T6HF7NztLgvbTzxuVyr8lSXAJ7bMo@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, em doesn't have a pluggable phy :) Hardware is different, that's why
there's
a different driver....

Jack


On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Alexander Sack <pisymbol@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Juli Mallett <jmallett@freebsd.org>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 19:56, Alexander Sack <pisymbol@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> $ ifconfig ix1
> >> ix1: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
> >
> > You need to bring the interface up in order for the SFP configuration to
> occur.
>
> I am little bit confused:
>
> What's different with the ixgbe(4) than em(4)?  i.e. My second em(4)
> interface auto-negotiates properly on boot up, why shouldn't ixgbe
> without having to do an additional ifconfig down/up cycle?
>
> (my ifconfig output above might be a little off since I was debugging
> my SFP issues).
>
> -aps
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTim9-Za5mzLTw7MDAHY_TuIQsQ0SF0_1xpxyGY7v>