Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 17:07:54 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: christopher-ml@telting.org, utisoft@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port dependencies Message-ID: <4d97ba5a.199K2FcyLXA6%2Bb5f%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinUz6DOMYhR7MHHtbMsK0UBNCwwBw@mail.gmail.com> References: <4D96668C.3090406@telting.org> <BANLkTinUz6DOMYhR7MHHtbMsK0UBNCwwBw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2 April 2011 00:58, Chris Telting <christopher-ml@telting.org> wrote: > > One of my biggest gripes with the ports system is dependency hell. > > I think you've misunderstood the term dependency hell [1]. Anyone > who has spent hours struggling with rpm ... would never dare to > even think of such terms when using the Ports Collection. Dependency purgatory?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4d97ba5a.199K2FcyLXA6%2Bb5f%perryh>