Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 02:48:36 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... Message-ID: <1497115560.20050215024836@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <BD1E0D37-7EF2-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC@shire.net> References: <20050213152331.2B00E16A4D1@hub.freebsd.org> <F64CC038-7EEE-11D9-B357-000D93C7878E@illusionart.com> <1722947768.20050215023424@wanadoo.fr> <BD1E0D37-7EF2-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC@shire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes: > That is laughable. MS IE on Windows has one of the worst reputations > around for following web standards. Go ask any professional designer. I did better. I actually ran the W3C conformance tests against MSIE, and it passed. At the time, no other browser came close. Today, MSIE is not the only browser with good conformance, but it is still one of the best. Firefox is young and has some security issues that worry me, but we shall see. Opera has the disadvantage of not being free, and you don't really get much in exchange for paying for it that you wouldn't already get with Firefox or MSIE. -- Anthony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1497115560.20050215024836>