Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Oct 2013 20:08:31 +0200
From:      Terje Elde <terje@elde.net>
To:        yudi v <yudi.tux@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Geli and ZFS
Message-ID:  <77878DF1-8266-406D-BD76-02295AE09CF0@elde.net>
In-Reply-To: <CACo--mtCxL1TPuACind8VsaFmA%2B7jB1Hxu0%2B5Pviauo=mV0vOA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CACo--mtCxL1TPuACind8VsaFmA%2B7jB1Hxu0%2B5Pviauo=mV0vOA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Apple-Mail=_052FB60A-7917-462B-A4D0-F3274E3EB14F
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252

On Oct 9, 2013, at 6:43 AM, yudi v <yudi.tux@gmail.com> wrote:

> Generally, it's recommended to let ZFS manage the whole disk if =
possible,
> so I was wondering if the second option is better.
> I will be using couple of 3TB HDDs mirrored for data and want to =
encrypt
> them.

IIRC, there is/was a major performance-difference on Solaris between =
using ZFS on a partition, or a whole disk.  FreeBSD is happy with =
either.

The two alternatives you mentioned were:

ZFS over GELI over disk
and
ZFS over GELI over ZFS over disk

While ZFS wouldn't get the raw disk in setup #1, the left-most ZFS =
wouldn't get it in the second scenario either.

> I am hoping someone with an in-depth understanding of ZFS will be able =
to
> offer some insight.


What I usually do and recommend is using GPT with labels for the =
partitions you'll put GELI/ZFS on.

There's a couple of different reasons for this:

 * It'll let you create your zpool on /dev/gpt/label, which will make it =
easy to find even when the device moves (harddisk-renumbering, changes =
from internal ATA to USB enclosure=85 )

 * You don't run things through ZFS twice.

 * The disk is fully encrypted.

 * etc

Terje


--Apple-Mail=_052FB60A-7917-462B-A4D0-F3274E3EB14F
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEkBAEBCgAGBQJSVu0lAAoJEKIog3c0EBYzZh8IPjeiHx14sJsoTDWtZtmz+W3t
5YFsutQlYgL/iXN0Wao6BJ/07UvwJn3LhVOGbGHkmDXJ5Z/4NjRjyXT7VBZlgaER
XgHfT0kooCy66MAVhjpWavuYTe1/s4BkofR1TI0U9fHuptj8QGFJ7oTNEPh38/o3
0E53XBWqI9VdXN3t8nzS8ul7gwFijkjlei/Vryq6AvUGKMYiBwPpDg8ke+AiG+T5
G72uEeQBJ2UkZlzISALOoHHZaaZ7wgJ3sFfYt3AfcQL0LeAgs7rWk1NztOjERcd1
bQXF24HweFoGCJGrXeDATZumn2dVYuSleHEdTfRCIMk9SewRICdL02U5UJJNrsQT
Yh6MLpGLBw==
=QYmE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_052FB60A-7917-462B-A4D0-F3274E3EB14F--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?77878DF1-8266-406D-BD76-02295AE09CF0>