Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:47:50 -0400 From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> To: Gautam <execve@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alpine mail client discontinued? Message-ID: <4EA56C86.30703@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAD9pFYCwpQ6F88oAwmNruXdzh60F9D2j1cF_jfc7S5=7cPfTjQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1110170021070.82407@yokozuna.lan> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1110161741360.58537@io-tx.com> <4E9B9863.6090106@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.02.1110231705550.3100@thor.farley.org> <CAD9pFYCwpQ6F88oAwmNruXdzh60F9D2j1cF_jfc7S5=7cPfTjQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/24/11 5:49 AM, Gautam wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Sean C. Farley <scf@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> >> On 10/16/2011 15:49, Ted Hatfield wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> re-alpine >>>> >>>> >>>> Of course, this could (should?) wait until 9 is out the door. >> >> >> Alpine is also documented in the handbook > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mail-agents.html ; so that also should > be updated. > Does the way in which re-alpine is used differ? If so, the Handbook can be updated if/when alpine is replaced with re-alpine, that's not a problem. I suspect, based on this thread, it won't be necessary other than noting the port is mail/re-alpine instead of mail/alpine. The Documentation people would be happy to update the alpine section in the Handbook in either case. Though, not all doc people are subscribed to ports@ - can someone ping us if/when re-alpine is in the tree as a replacement? -- Glen Barber | gjb@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Documentation Project
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EA56C86.30703>