Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 13:30:44 -0700 From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Chuck Burns <break19@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS Performance issue against NetApp Message-ID: <897E0179-A848-4103-9273-5F7257CFC50A@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <CAE2yjrr9pLEqn9E8NuuzHz3fd4Ui5VvTahWR1TAM4ZdH3m8%2BKg@mail.gmail.com> References: <834305228.13772274.1367527941142.JavaMail.root@k-state.edu> <75CB6F1E-385D-4E51-876E-7BB8D7140263@hub.org> <20130502221857.GJ32659@physics.umn.edu> <420165EE-BBBF-4E97-B476-58FFE55A52AA@hub.org> <5183074B.5090004@egr.msu.edu> <CAE2yjrr9pLEqn9E8NuuzHz3fd4Ui5VvTahWR1TAM4ZdH3m8%2BKg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013-05-02, at 19:53 , Chuck Burns <break19@gmail.com> wrote: >=20 > Here is another possibility. Most linux distros put /tmp on tmpfs, = whereas > FreeBSD by default uses actual disk space. =46rom what I can tell, nothing is actually being written to /tmp =85 = but, I just added mounting /tmp using tmpfs to my /etc/fstab file, *just = in case* =85 made no difference =85
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?897E0179-A848-4103-9273-5F7257CFC50A>