Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:15:57 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Attilio Rao <attilio@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Stop scheduler on panic Message-ID: <4EDBF11D.6030401@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-FndBksoDCfOL44X2OXO0C024gPE2aT3wiJoNZZNJxvWttDg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20111113083215.GV50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <201111171638.03208.jhb@freebsd.org> <4EC6D544.5040803@FreeBSD.org> <201111211132.42119.jhb@freebsd.org> <CAJ-FndBksoDCfOL44X2OXO0C024gPE2aT3wiJoNZZNJxvWttDg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 21/11/2011 18:58 Attilio Rao said the following: > I would be very in favor about having a 'thread trampoline for KDB', > thus that it can use locks. I keep hearing the suggestion to add this trampoline, but I admit that I do not understand its technical meaning in this context. And also how it helps with the locking. So I will appreciate an explanation! Thanks! -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EDBF11D.6030401>