Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Apr 2017 11:41:26 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Valentin VERGEZ <valentin.vergez@stormshield.eu>
To:        Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [PHY] Adaptive equipment
Message-ID:  <2059229927.50320865.1493199686278.JavaMail.zimbra@stormshield.eu>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomiafpnpCJUfU-s%2BxvhxZmCXPyruyu13Me73JKNgQU9Cw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <159600163.49355995.1492610180223.JavaMail.zimbra@stormshield.eu> <CAJ-VmomiafpnpCJUfU-s%2BxvhxZmCXPyruyu13Me73JKNgQU9Cw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

Thanks adrian for the answers !

I wonder who provides the ATH HAL (for 93000) ? Qualcomm ?
The linux ath9k do not use any HAL, so does Qualcomm provide an HAL only fo=
r BSD ?

Valentin,

----- Mail original -----
> De: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>
> =C3=80: "Valentin VERGEZ" <valentin.vergez@stormshield.eu>
> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
> Envoy=C3=A9: Mercredi 19 Avril 2017 17:23:25
> Objet: Re: [PHY] Adaptive equipment

> hiya,
>=20
> there's no DFS mode publicly available for ath. Everything but the
> radar detector is in freebsd-head.
>=20
> Oh, if it's talking about adaptive being "transmit rate" then yes, you
> can configure a static transmit rate (ifconfig wlanX ucastrate Y).
>=20
> Listen before talk is normal atheros CCA. it's done by the chip,
> programmed by the HAL and can be driver controlled if you know what
> code to add. By default it's set to the -62dBm level that you need for
> CCA.
>=20
> Thanks!
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -adrian
>=20
>=20
> On 19 April 2017 at 06:56, Valentin VERGEZ
> <valentin.vergez@stormshield.eu> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Do you guys know if the "Adaptive" aspect on a FreeBSD wifi product is
>> manageable ?
>> For an ETSI compliance certification, on a FreeBSD wifi Access Point wit=
h
>> Atheros AR9380 NIC, the certifying authority needs to know if the equipm=
ent is
>> adaptive or non-adaptive. And if it's an adaptive equipment, if it has t=
he
>> possibility to switch to a non-adaptive mode.
>>
>> Regarding ETSI EN 300 328 V1.9.1 section 4.2.2, Adaptive could correspon=
d to DFS
>> ... which, on hostap mode, is not fully implemented ?
>>
>> I thought that adaptive was for auto-selecting modulation depending on
>> Signal/Noise ratio. But now, i'm confused.
>>
>> However, it is my understanding that these aspects are operated by the Q=
ualcomm
>> HAL and therefore not manageable. I seek confirmation on this point.
>>
>> While I am on the subject, I wonder if the "Listen Before Talk" is Frame=
 Based
>> or Load Based. And again, is it operated by the HAL or an upper layer ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ---
>>
>>
>> Valentin VERGEZ
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.=
org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2059229927.50320865.1493199686278.JavaMail.zimbra>