Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:19:40 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: hiren panchasara <hiren.panchasara@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [iwn] Cedric's stuff is in -HEAD Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmon6FYZz05QvGXTkAtnwGAcRyb3D8-OfgzYQz83wT_C%2BOQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CALCpEUEaK2McMqPNqyPeti66oZKX28YYVUMK6vsNcBM6hRLyZA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-VmonisPn5msJqtnYcYbNYj8kaD4X3HMS8x3euL%2BKFBXiQnA@mail.gmail.com> <CALCpEUFY0-tsw0MLTDMsgswL11mcDdUN2s%2B0tc6KEjYEZxx-gw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmoknEa1T64JZ7iEknaur7_GAmPrEqH38-3A6pMJ9ogTpHQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALCpEUEaK2McMqPNqyPeti66oZKX28YYVUMK6vsNcBM6hRLyZA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12 November 2013 11:13, hiren panchasara <hiren.panchasara@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: >> Run with wlandebug +assoc +state +debug +output +scan +crypto > > http://people.freebsd.org/~hiren/20131112_iwnfail_atwork.txt What's this showing? What was going on at this time? > Thanks a bunch Adrian! so, I have a feeling that for "best" iwn(4) behaviour, we should likely extend net80211 to not do its own scan stuff (by putting the VAP into power save mode whilst doing scanning) but just to fire off a scan request. I _think_ iwn(4) will do it itself. We should however still fix the scan code to not be a racy, unpredictable thing. -adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmon6FYZz05QvGXTkAtnwGAcRyb3D8-OfgzYQz83wT_C%2BOQ>