Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 14:32:13 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-questions\@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PAM conditional authentication (advanced control syntax) Message-ID: <867eyyow1e.fsf@desk.des.no> In-Reply-To: <CAOc73CCYjCdcV5AkW7DJZLqbaSuxSAHmRC7RQW-4LRPy7GzaYQ@mail.gmail.com> (Ben Woods's message of "Sat, 22 Jul 2017 17:23:07 %2B0800") References: <CAOc73CCYjCdcV5AkW7DJZLqbaSuxSAHmRC7RQW-4LRPy7GzaYQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com> writes: > In Linux PAM this is possible using the advanced control syntax, > however this doesn't appear to exist in OpenPAM. Is there any plans to > implement it, or something similar? I'm not opposed to it, but it would only be a crutch, and I'd rather spend my limited time working on a more permanent solution (meaning: something that replaces PAM and NSS entirely, with a much richer configuration language). Also, Michael Lucas would hate me for making PAM Mastery obsolete :) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?867eyyow1e.fsf>