Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:44:07 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Robert Millan <rmh@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>, d@delphij.net, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: RFC: MK_BLOBS build option
Message-ID:  <B444CC5D-FF5F-437B-863D-D95C2040E0CD@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOfDtXN3cW6JswPddsOunWFvb%2Bs%2BB4skAd_qR0k3wHfDWWt9sQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20120122201814.GA32081@thorin> <4F1DBB94.900@delphij.net> <0455F6A3-A04A-43C0-9E40-B19ABC4FDDAF@bsdimp.com> <CAOfDtXPKQ00hgLD3%2ByBWqKx%2BBuvV_wm73TCmf1yut8-FZ2MQgQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOfDtXN3cW6JswPddsOunWFvb%2Bs%2BB4skAd_qR0k3wHfDWWt9sQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Jan 25, 2012, at 11:40 AM, Robert Millan wrote:

> El 24 de gener de 2012 10:35, Robert Millan <rmh@freebsd.org> ha =
escrit:
>> El 23 de gener de 2012 23:13, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> ha escrit:
>>> I like the idea, but hate the name.  BLOB has a negative =
connotation, and this option would seem to imply the project doesn't =
like blobs, which isn't the case.  Can we find a different name for this =
please?
>>=20
>> I'm open to suggestions.  What would you call them?
>=20
> I gave this some thought, looking for a more neutral term that is
> still accurate. How about MK_SOURCELESS_CODE?

I like that a lot better...  Sorry I was slow in making a suggestion...

Warner





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B444CC5D-FF5F-437B-863D-D95C2040E0CD>