Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 03:57:04 -0700 From: Hiten Pandya <hmp@nxad.com> To: "Oldach, Helge" <Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com> Cc: 'Bryce Edwards' <bryce@bryce.net> Subject: Re: freevrrp Message-ID: <20030802105704.GA33703@perrin.int.nxad.com> In-Reply-To: <D2CFC58E0F8CB443B54BE72201E8916E94C9B4@dehhx005.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com> References: <D2CFC58E0F8CB443B54BE72201E8916E94C9B4@dehhx005.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 09:00:09PM +0200, Oldach, Helge wrote:
> > From: Bryce Edwards [mailto:bryce@bryce.net]
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 31. Juli 2003 18:59
> > To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> > Subject: freevrrp
> >
> > I'm trying to run freevrrpd on a server with two interfaces
> > for redundancy.
>
> I would prefer a layer 2 based approach ("EtherChannel") instead because of
> the much better convergence in case of failure, and you also get load
> sharing in both directions. Bundling two or more interfaces by means of
> netgraph would probably serve the job.
>
> Are there any off-the-shelf, i.e. native FEC solutions available?
Have you tried the Netgraph FEC module? I donno if that's what
you want, but worth checking out...
--
Hiten M. Pandya
hmp@FreeBSD.ORG, hmp@nxad.com
http://hmp.serverninjas.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030802105704.GA33703>