Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 2 Feb 2013 11:52:51 +0000
From:      Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To:        Dmitry Sivachenko <trtrmitya@gmail.com>
Cc:        Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@freebsd.org>, python <python@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [Fwd: python33-3.3.0_2 failed on amd64 9.1-glib]
Message-ID:  <CADLo838SJdBj2Y0xSYt%2B7SbRpqOU4t8NOc0_toS1zOvw-CMr8g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D783B26B-40C7-42D8-80B2-38EC0AFCF159@gmail.com>
References:  <CADLo83-SkxSwRiVhQWD6HeoX8g10shkqF5nGmK_NsxT5u6n6kg@mail.gmail.com> <FAE77598-7864-468A-92D6-7FB12D7872D1@gmail.com> <CADLo838CdB-4TKP=7DLkG2sKewspgRhXVkn%2B5hXkFNPUnOoZ7A@mail.gmail.com> <D783B26B-40C7-42D8-80B2-38EC0AFCF159@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2 February 2013 11:29, Dmitry Sivachenko <trtrmitya@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 02.02.2013, at 15:28, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 1 February 2013 18:51, Dmitry Sivachenko <trtrmitya@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Upgrade to 9-STABLE and it will package correctly.
>>>
>>> See http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=243331
>>
>> That's great, and I understand that ports are only guaranteed to work
>> on -stable etc... but don't you think that broken on latest release is
>> unacceptable?
>
>
> Before the release, I asked re@ to MFC this change to 9.1-RELEASE.
> They decided it is not necessary, so the answer is: it is acceptable.

Hm, thanks-- I'll bring it up with them.

Chris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo838SJdBj2Y0xSYt%2B7SbRpqOU4t8NOc0_toS1zOvw-CMr8g>