Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:18:04 -0500 From: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org> To: Justin Hibbits <jrh29@alumni.cwru.edu> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, gerald@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: r288669 breaks ports building with USE_GCC=yes Message-ID: <561D129C.9040604@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <DDAFD5A6-C049-4041-BF36-0D12DBC08F3A@alumni.cwru.edu> References: <CAHSQbTC1ReVYiwcd6HxbteOyDeOxt1_ydz3zcFR3_Loc_X748A@mail.gmail.com> <561C1523.7080200@FreeBSD.org> <561C17F2.2030206@FreeBSD.org> <CAHSQbTC=SW8MOD63C=Gv8wqAWqyRrbpBeifo9HUfW98Sx8UJnA@mail.gmail.com> <561C4F10.7060206@FreeBSD.org> <DDAFD5A6-C049-4041-BF36-0D12DBC08F3A@alumni.cwru.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi;
On 10/12/2015 8:28 PM, Justin Hibbits wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> ...
> This is on powerpc64. I see the patch has been there for 16 months,
> but for some reason, the /usr/local/bin/gcc48 doesn't contain the
> patch. I ran `strings` on the binary, and it has the following string:
>
> %{fstack-protector|fstack-protector-all:-lssp_nonshared}
>
> Which, if you examine files/patch-stackprotector-gcc, is the unpatched
> string.
>
> I have no idea why this is the case.
>
I think it is important to determine if this is a problem from upstream or
a problem in the gcc48 backported patches. Please test building with gcc49
or gcc5.
This is just for curiosity ... I am keeping my fingers away from GCC ;).
Pedro.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?561D129C.9040604>