Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 Jul 2002 19:39:52 -0500
From:      David Syphers <dsyphers@uchicago.edu>
To:        "Chris McCluskey" <chris@digitaldeck.com>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Which SSH now (and when)?
Message-ID:  <200207011939.52104.dsyphers@uchicago.edu>
In-Reply-To: <ECEPLGOFLCLKKCNAGCBHMEHOCEAA.chris@digitaldeck.com>
References:  <ECEPLGOFLCLKKCNAGCBHMEHOCEAA.chris@digitaldeck.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 01 July 2002 02:57 pm, Chris McCluskey wrote:
> I was hoping that everyone out there can clarify a couple questions
> (and/or possibly false statements) I have regarding SSH.
> 
> FreeBSD (4.5) SSH in the system source is (or was) built from
> OpenSSH3.3?

ssh -V

4.5-R has OpenSSH 2.9 with patches, as does 4.6-R.

> To stay consistent with the FreeBSD project then, it would be a good
> idea to build out of the openssh or openssh-portable ports instead of
> the ssh/ssh2 ports -- using the portable port if and only if PAM
> support is needed?

OpenSSH 3.4 is being integrated into -stable.  And they are using 
openssh-portable because of PAM.

-David

-- 
Everyone who believes in telekinesis, raise my hand...

Astronomy and Astrophysics Center
The University of Chicago

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207011939.52104.dsyphers>